Responsabilidad Civil en las relaciones familiares: ocultación de la paternidad.
Archivos
NO SE HA AUTORIZADO la consulta de los documentos asociados
Fecha
2017-06
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
[ES]En el presente trabajo se tratará de forma detenida el novedoso tema de la responsabilidad derivada de la ocultación de la paternidad. Para ello, habrá que analizar el concepto del deber de fidelidad así como su naturaleza. En virtud de nuestra doctrina y jurisprudencia dominante, la infidelidad por sí sola no conlleva el deber de indemnizar al cónyuge víctima de ella, pero sí que se ha empezado a admitir tal resarcimiento en los supuestos de daños derivados de ocultación de la paternidad cuando la esposa hubiera actuado de forma dolosa o en algunos casos simplemente concurriendo culpa grave. Los tribunales han admitido demandas tanto por daños morales como patrimoniales, siendo éstos la devolución de las cantidades satisfechas en concepto de alimentos. Por último, analizamos de un modo más detenido la STS de 24 de abril de 2015.
[EN]In the present work, the novel subject of responsibility derived from the concealment of paternity will be treated in a detailed way. To do this, we must analyze the concept of the duty of fidelity as well as its nature. By virtue of our dominant doctrine and jurisprudence, infidelity alone does not imply the duty to compensate the spouse victim of it, but it has begun to admit such compensation in the cases of damages derived from concealment of paternity when the wife Had acted fraudulently or in some cases simply by committing serious fault. The courts have admitted claims for both moral and property damages, which are the return of the amounts paid as food. Finally, we look more closely at the STS of April 24, 2015.
[EN]In the present work, the novel subject of responsibility derived from the concealment of paternity will be treated in a detailed way. To do this, we must analyze the concept of the duty of fidelity as well as its nature. By virtue of our dominant doctrine and jurisprudence, infidelity alone does not imply the duty to compensate the spouse victim of it, but it has begun to admit such compensation in the cases of damages derived from concealment of paternity when the wife Had acted fraudulently or in some cases simply by committing serious fault. The courts have admitted claims for both moral and property damages, which are the return of the amounts paid as food. Finally, we look more closely at the STS of April 24, 2015.