ESTUDIO JURÍDICO DE UNAS LESIONES GRAVES
Fecha
2018-01-10
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
[ES] Este dictamen tiene como objetivo dar respuesta a la consulta formulada por D. Antonio Pulido Verdasco; una vez estudiado el caso, además de la legislación, doctrina y jurisprudencia aplicable, observamos que nos encontramos ante un delito de lesiones graves del art. 148.1 del Código Penal. Explicamos también por qué la prisión provisional no es la medida cautelar más adecuada para imponerle a D. Antonio. El presente caso se tramita por el procedimiento abreviado ante el Juzgado de lo Penal que corresponda. Concurren circunstancias modificativas de la responsabilidad criminal, la eximente incompleta de legítima defensa del art. 20.4 CP y las atenuantes de arrebato del art. 21.3 CP y la de reparación del daño del art. 21.5 CP. Además, nuestro representado debe satisfacer en concepto de responsabilidad civil la cantidad de 1.258,82€.
[EN] This verdict aims to answer to the consultation made by Mr. Antonio Pulido Verdasco; once the case has been studied, in addition to the legislation, doctrine and jurisprudence applicable, we observe that we are facing serious injuries of art. 148.1 of the Criminal Code. We also explain why provisional prision is not the most appropriate precautionary measure to impose on Mr. Antonio. The present case is processed by the abbreviated procedure before the corresponding Criminal Court. The following modifying circumstances of criminal responsibility should be met, the incomplete exempt of self-defense of art. 20.4 CP and the extenuating circumstances of fury of art. 21.3 CP and the repair of damage of art. 21.5 CP. In addition, our represented of be satisfied in concept of civil liability the amount of 1258.82 €.
[EN] This verdict aims to answer to the consultation made by Mr. Antonio Pulido Verdasco; once the case has been studied, in addition to the legislation, doctrine and jurisprudence applicable, we observe that we are facing serious injuries of art. 148.1 of the Criminal Code. We also explain why provisional prision is not the most appropriate precautionary measure to impose on Mr. Antonio. The present case is processed by the abbreviated procedure before the corresponding Criminal Court. The following modifying circumstances of criminal responsibility should be met, the incomplete exempt of self-defense of art. 20.4 CP and the extenuating circumstances of fury of art. 21.3 CP and the repair of damage of art. 21.5 CP. In addition, our represented of be satisfied in concept of civil liability the amount of 1258.82 €.