El diálogo entre tribunales
Fecha
2014-07-08
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
[ES]Al referirme al término "diálogo" en este trabajo, me situaré en el fenómeno por el que dos o más Tribunales, estatales o internacionales, se relacionan entre si manteniendo conversaciones jurisprudenciales.
En el ámbito continental, este diálogo irá encaminado hacia un fortalecimiento y superación de barreras del llamado "Constitucionalismo Europeo'', sobre todo en materia de Derechos Humanos. Todo ello, gracias a la función de los diferentes Tribunales nacionales e internacionales como elementos claves para alcanzar una verdadera iteración.
Voy a centrar también este trabajo en las relaciones entre la Corte lnteramericana de Derechos Humanos y el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. La integración de este punto, es debido a las similitudes entre ambas Cortes al aparecer ambas instituciones como máximas protectoras de los DD.HH.
Haré referencia también a la lucha en la que el Derecho Penal Internacional anda inmerso para acabar con la impunidad de aquellas personas que incurren en delitos contra los Derechos Humanos, en los crímenes de Lesa Humanidad.
Del mismo modo, hablaré sobre la necesidad de buscar los caminos adecuados para alcanzar los lazos comunes que lleven a un verdadero "Diálogo entre Tribunales".
[EN]When I use the term 'dialogue' in this work, it is referred to the situations by means of which two or more national or international Courts are related one each other by means of jurisprudential conversations. If we are dealing with continents, this dialogue intends the increase of the European Constitutionalism ,mainly in the field of Hunan Rights. This happens thanks to the role that different national and international Courts play as key elements to get a real interaction. I focus this work as well, on the relationships between the lnter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights.They both are faced together due to the similitude shared by them, mainly because of their behavior as the most important institutions devoted to the safeguarding and protection of Human Rights. This piece of writing makes a reference to the effort made by the lnternational Civil Law to avoid the impunity that may have people who commit crimes against human rights,mainly against Humanity. At the same time I will take into account the possibility of searching appropriate ways to strengthen common bonds to achieve a true dialogue among Courts.
[EN]When I use the term 'dialogue' in this work, it is referred to the situations by means of which two or more national or international Courts are related one each other by means of jurisprudential conversations. If we are dealing with continents, this dialogue intends the increase of the European Constitutionalism ,mainly in the field of Hunan Rights. This happens thanks to the role that different national and international Courts play as key elements to get a real interaction. I focus this work as well, on the relationships between the lnter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights.They both are faced together due to the similitude shared by them, mainly because of their behavior as the most important institutions devoted to the safeguarding and protection of Human Rights. This piece of writing makes a reference to the effort made by the lnternational Civil Law to avoid the impunity that may have people who commit crimes against human rights,mainly against Humanity. At the same time I will take into account the possibility of searching appropriate ways to strengthen common bonds to achieve a true dialogue among Courts.