EL MODELO PARTICIPATIVO EN LA GESTIÓN DE AGROECOSISTEMAS: ANÁLISIS DE DECISIÓN MULTICRITERIO COMO HERRAMIENTA DE EVALUACIÓN
Fecha
2023-12-19
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
[ES]El estudio analizó la selección de soluciones sostenibles para la gestión de agroecosistemas utilizando el método
TOPSIS. Se evaluaron dos escenarios: recomendaciones tecnológicas sostenibles para el olivar y medidas de
reducción del riesgo de inundación y erosión en entornos agrícolas. Se obtuvo información a través de un modelo
participativo y cuestionarios a diferentes actores. En el primer escenario, las recomendaciones mejor posicionadas
estaban relacionadas con la información y formación de los agricultores. En el segundo escenario, las soluciones
basadas en la naturaleza fueron las mejor posicionadas. Al cambiar los pesos de los criterios, se observaron
diferencias en la selección de alternativas. En general, el método TOPSIS resultó útil para la toma de decisiones en
escenarios complejos.
[EN]The study analyzed the selection of sustainable solutions for the management of agroecosystems using the TOPSIS method. Two scenarios were evaluated: sustainable technological recommendations for the olive grove and measures to reduce the risk of flooding and erosion in agricultural environments. Information was obtained through a participatory model and questionnaires to different actors. In the first scenario, the best positioned recommendations were related to the information and training of farmers. In the second scenario, nature-based solutions were the best positioned. By changing the weights of the criteria, differences were observed in the selection of alternatives. In general, the TOPSIS method was useful for decision making in complex scenarios.
[EN]The study analyzed the selection of sustainable solutions for the management of agroecosystems using the TOPSIS method. Two scenarios were evaluated: sustainable technological recommendations for the olive grove and measures to reduce the risk of flooding and erosion in agricultural environments. Information was obtained through a participatory model and questionnaires to different actors. In the first scenario, the best positioned recommendations were related to the information and training of farmers. In the second scenario, nature-based solutions were the best positioned. By changing the weights of the criteria, differences were observed in the selection of alternatives. In general, the TOPSIS method was useful for decision making in complex scenarios.