Violencia de género: lesiones
Archivos
Fecha
2015-07
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
El delito de violencia de género manifiesta la desigualdad y discrimi nación entre hombres y mujeres. Su tradicional integración en los delitos de violencia doméstica trae consigo la dificultad de delimitar ambos conceptos. La LOVG concreta su objeto pero no el concepto de violencia de género. La cuestión sobre la determinación del d iscutido bien juríd ico protegido es clave para conocer cómo sancionar por la variante "género" en los delitos de lesiones. El auténtico problema de la violencia de género es el sometimiento habitual de la mujer en un contexto machista. Sin embargo, el artículo 173.2 ocupa un segundo plano tras la reforma de 2003 que incluyó al "privilegiado" artículo 153 en el Código penal. Desde ese momento todo ataque contra la integridad personal es considerado como delito de forma automática. Contrariamente a su fin agravatorio, en ocasiones actuará atenuando la conducta. El debate como veremos, es cuanto menos paradójico .
The crime of domestic violence manifest inequality and discri mination between men and women. Traditional integrati on into crimes of domestic violence brings the difficulty of defining both concepts. The LOVG concrete its object but not the concept of gender-based violence. The question of the determination of the argued lega l protected is key to knowi ng how to punish by the variant 'gender' in the offences of injuries. The real problem of gender-based violence is the usual submission of women in a macho context. However , article 173.2 occupies a back seat after the 2003 reform which included the "privileged" artic le 153 in the penal code. Since that time ali attack on personal integrity i s considered as crime automatically. Contrary to an agravatorio end, sometimes it will act attenuating behavior. The debate as we shall see, is much less paradoxical.
The crime of domestic violence manifest inequality and discri mination between men and women. Traditional integrati on into crimes of domestic violence brings the difficulty of defining both concepts. The LOVG concrete its object but not the concept of gender-based violence. The question of the determination of the argued lega l protected is key to knowi ng how to punish by the variant 'gender' in the offences of injuries. The real problem of gender-based violence is the usual submission of women in a macho context. However , article 173.2 occupies a back seat after the 2003 reform which included the "privileged" artic le 153 in the penal code. Since that time ali attack on personal integrity i s considered as crime automatically. Contrary to an agravatorio end, sometimes it will act attenuating behavior. The debate as we shall see, is much less paradoxical.