Razonamiento Proposicional en la psicología del pensamiento: Diferencia de procesamiento humano con Modo indicativo y Modo Subjuntivo
Archivos
NO SE HA AUTORIZADO la consulta de los documentos asociados
Fecha
2016-06-14
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
En este TFG experimental se pretende indagar sobre la capacidad de procesamiento humano y los procesos que subyacen en él como la comprensión y el razonamiento, para ello se presenta un experimento que examina la representación mental en modelos abstractos y temáticos además de introducir una variante verbal indicativa y subjuntiva. usando una tarea de selección para inferir la representación mental que las personas tienen en mente cuando razonan con condicionales y, además, introducimos dos contextos: Abstracto y temático. Este experimento demostró que los participantes seleccionaban la respuesta “p y q” más frecuentemente que “p y no q” (respuesta correcta) y había un mayor porcentaje de aciertos en la versión temática que en la versión abstracta. Nuestra investigación concuerda con los modelos mentales de Johnson-Laird, donde se pone de manifiesto que las personas construimos modelos basados en nuestras experiencias personales y con las conclusiones halladas por Evans y Wason donde afirman que se produce un sesgo de verificación, donde las personas tienden a seleccionar aquello que aparece en el enunciado.
In this TFG experimental is to investigate the ability of human processing and processes that underlie it as understanding and reasoning, for it an experiment that examines the mental representation in abstract and thematic models also introduce a variant presents verbal indicative and subjunctive. Abstract and theme: a task selection to infer the mental representation that people have in mind when reasoning with conditionals and also introduce two contexts was used. This experiment showed that participants selected the answer "p and q" more often than "p and not q" (correct 4 answer) and had a higher percentage of hits in the theme version that in the abstract version. Our research has relation with the mental models of Johnson-Laird, where it shows that people build models based on our personal experiences and the conclusions found by Evans and Wason where they state that verification bias occurs where people tend to select what appears in the statement.
In this TFG experimental is to investigate the ability of human processing and processes that underlie it as understanding and reasoning, for it an experiment that examines the mental representation in abstract and thematic models also introduce a variant presents verbal indicative and subjunctive. Abstract and theme: a task selection to infer the mental representation that people have in mind when reasoning with conditionals and also introduce two contexts was used. This experiment showed that participants selected the answer "p and q" more often than "p and not q" (correct 4 answer) and had a higher percentage of hits in the theme version that in the abstract version. Our research has relation with the mental models of Johnson-Laird, where it shows that people build models based on our personal experiences and the conclusions found by Evans and Wason where they state that verification bias occurs where people tend to select what appears in the statement.