EVALUACIÓN INTEGRADA DE PRÁCTICAS DE AGRICULTURA REGENERATIVA EN LA PROVISIÓN DE SERVICIOS ECOSISTÉMICOS
Fecha
2024-09-19
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
[ES] El objetivo de este trabajo es evaluar el impacto de varios escenarios de agricultura regenerativa en los cultivos de
almendros de secano en una variedad de servicios ecosistémicos. Se realizó un Análisis Multicriterio (AMC) para
evaluar los diferentes escenarios de gestión de tierras, integrando diferentes indicadores cuantitativos y cualitativos
basados en investigaciones a largo plazo en el campo. Se analizaron tres escenarios de gestión de tierras: (i)
convencional, (ii) cultivos de cobertura naturales y (iii) cultivos de cobertura sembrados. El AMC permitió evaluar el
rendimiento de los 3 escenarios de gestión considerando diferentes prioridades de dos grupos diferentes de
agricultores (agricultores convencionales y agricultores regenerativos) y puntuar los diferentes escenarios. El
escenario de cultivos de cobertura naturales obtuvo la mejor puntuación en casi todos los grupos de servicios
ecosistémicos, incluidos los indicadores económicos. Se logró la sostenibilidad, la aceptación y la estabilidad de los
escenarios, lo que proporcionó una vista integrada de los impactos que pueden ayudar en la toma de decisiones.
[EN] The objective of this work is to evaluate the impact of several regenerative agriculture scenarios in rainfed almond crops on a range of ecosystems services. A Multi‐Criteria Analysis (MCA) was conducted to evaluate the different land management scenarios integrating different quantitative and qualitative indicators based on long‐term field research. Three land management scenarios were analyzed: (i) conventional, (ii) natural cover crops and (iii) seeded cover crops. MCA was able to offer the performance of the 3 management scenarios considering different priorities of two different groups of farmers (conventional farmers and regenerative farmers) and score the different scenarios. The scenario of natural cover crops had the best score in almost all the groups of ecosystem services, including economic indicators. Sustainability, acceptance, and stability of the scenarios was achieved and provided an integrated view of impacts that can help decision making.
[EN] The objective of this work is to evaluate the impact of several regenerative agriculture scenarios in rainfed almond crops on a range of ecosystems services. A Multi‐Criteria Analysis (MCA) was conducted to evaluate the different land management scenarios integrating different quantitative and qualitative indicators based on long‐term field research. Three land management scenarios were analyzed: (i) conventional, (ii) natural cover crops and (iii) seeded cover crops. MCA was able to offer the performance of the 3 management scenarios considering different priorities of two different groups of farmers (conventional farmers and regenerative farmers) and score the different scenarios. The scenario of natural cover crops had the best score in almost all the groups of ecosystem services, including economic indicators. Sustainability, acceptance, and stability of the scenarios was achieved and provided an integrated view of impacts that can help decision making.