COMPARACIÓN DEL NIVEL DE ACTIVIDAD FÍSICA, TIPOLOGÍA CORPORAL, Y CONDICIÓN FÍSICA, CON RESILIENCIA, EMPATÍA Y ASERTIVIDAD EN ADOLESCENTES
Archivos
NO SE HA AUTORIZADO la consulta de los documentos asociados
Fecha
2019-06-25
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
[ES]El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar el nivel de actividad física, tipología
corporal, y condición física respecto a la resiliencia, la empatía y la asertividad. La
muestra estaba formada por 133 adolescentes (69 chicos y 64 chicas). El nivel de
actividad física se midió con el cuestionario MVPA. La tipología corporal se midió según
el Índice de Masa Corporal de los participantes y la condición física mediante los test
course navette, dinamometría manual, salto horizontal, flexibilidad y velocidad 4x10 de
las baterías ALPHA fitness y EUROFIT. La resiliencia, la empatía y la asertividad se
evaluaron mediante las pruebas READ, IRI y un test de Asertividad, respectivamente.
Los resultados mostraron diferencias en resiliencia en sujetos físicamente activos
(3.919±.608vs4.333±.544), en sujetos con mayor resistencia aeróbica
(3.605±.608vs4.017±.562) menor fuerza en mano izquierda (4.785±.325vs4.333±.671)
y baja fuerza de tren inferior (4.547±.293vs4.092±.614) Además, se encontraron mejoras
en la empatía en chicos con mayor fuerza en tren inferior (2.517±.568 vs 1.903±.654) y
sujetos con mayor flexibilidad (3.021±.729vs2.643±.463). Respecto a la asertividad no
se encontraron diferencias significativas en su asociación con la resiliencia, la empatía y
la asertividad. Por tanto, podemos concluir que se producen mejoras en resiliencia y
empatía en sujetos físicamente activos y en función del nivel de condición física.
Palabras clave: actividad física, tipología corporal, condición física, resiliencia, empatía,
asertividad y adolescentes
[EN]The objective of the present study was to compare the level of physical activity, body type, and physical condition with respect to resilience, empathy and assertiveness. The sample consisted of 133 adolescents (69 boys and 64 girls). The level of physical activity was measured with the MVPA questionnaire. The body typology was measured according to the Body Mass Index of the participants and the physical condition using the course navette test, manual dynamometer, horizontal jump, flexibility and 4x10 speed of the ALPHA fitness and EUROFIT batteries. Resilience, empathy and assertiveness were assessed through the READ, IRI and an Assertiveness test, respectively. The results showed differences in resilience in physically active subjects (3,919 ± .608 vs 4,333 ± .544), in subjects with greater aerobic resistance (3,605 ± .608 vs 4,017 ± .562) lower force in the left hand (4,785 ± .325vs4. 333 ± .671) and lower lower train strength (4.547 ± .293vs4.092 ± .614) In addition, improvements in empathy were found in boys with greater strength in the lower train (2.517 ± .568 vs 1.903 ± .654) and subjects with greater flexibility (3.021 ± .729vs2.643 ± .463). Regarding assertiveness, no significant differences were found in their association with resilience, empathy and assertiveness. Therefore, we can conclude that there are improvements in resilience and empathy in physically active subjects and in terms of the level of physical condition. Key words: physical activity, body composition, physical condition, resilience, empathy, asertiveness, teenagers.
[EN]The objective of the present study was to compare the level of physical activity, body type, and physical condition with respect to resilience, empathy and assertiveness. The sample consisted of 133 adolescents (69 boys and 64 girls). The level of physical activity was measured with the MVPA questionnaire. The body typology was measured according to the Body Mass Index of the participants and the physical condition using the course navette test, manual dynamometer, horizontal jump, flexibility and 4x10 speed of the ALPHA fitness and EUROFIT batteries. Resilience, empathy and assertiveness were assessed through the READ, IRI and an Assertiveness test, respectively. The results showed differences in resilience in physically active subjects (3,919 ± .608 vs 4,333 ± .544), in subjects with greater aerobic resistance (3,605 ± .608 vs 4,017 ± .562) lower force in the left hand (4,785 ± .325vs4. 333 ± .671) and lower lower train strength (4.547 ± .293vs4.092 ± .614) In addition, improvements in empathy were found in boys with greater strength in the lower train (2.517 ± .568 vs 1.903 ± .654) and subjects with greater flexibility (3.021 ± .729vs2.643 ± .463). Regarding assertiveness, no significant differences were found in their association with resilience, empathy and assertiveness. Therefore, we can conclude that there are improvements in resilience and empathy in physically active subjects and in terms of the level of physical condition. Key words: physical activity, body composition, physical condition, resilience, empathy, asertiveness, teenagers.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Educación Física