Las consecuencias accesorias del delito: El decomiso.
Archivos
NO SE HA AUTORIZADO la consulta de los documentos asociados
Fecha
2021-07-03
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
En este trabajo se lleva a cabo el estudio del Título VI de nuestro
Código Penal, denominado “de las consecuencias accesorias”,
pero centrándolo especialmente en el análisis de la figura del
decomiso. El decomiso de los frutos del delito es uno de los
principales objetivos de la intervención judicial, sobre todo en los
delitos de narcotráfico y los cometidos mediante la formación de
bandas organizadas. Denominado con anterioridad a la reforma
1/2015 como “comiso”, el mismo se encuentra regulado
actualmente a lo largo de nueve artículos recogidos en el título, los
cuales son el 127, 127 bis, 127 ter, 127 quáter, 127quinquies, 127
sexies, 127 septies, 127 octies y 128, y en los que se recogen las
distintas modalidades de decomiso (directo u ordinario, por
sustitución o por valor equivalente, decomiso ampliado, decomiso
sin condena o sin proceso principal y decomiso de bienes de
terceros). Fue en 2015 cuando el decomiso experimentó la mayor
de sus reformas, junto con el resto de las consecuencias
accesorias, por exigencias del derecho internacional, debido a la
trasposición de la Directiva 2014/42/UE, por esto, la misma va a
ser de vital importancia a lo largo de todo el trabajo.
In this work the study of Title VI of our Penal Code is carried out, called "accessory consequences", but focusing especially on the analysis of the figure of seizure. The confiscation of the objects of crime is one of the main objectives of judicial intervention, especially in drug trafficking crimes and those committed through the formation of organized gangs. Named prior to the reform 1/2015 as “comiso”, it is currently regulated through nine articles included in the title, which are the 127, 127 bis, 127 ter, 127 quáter, 127quinquies, 127 sexies, 127 septies, 127 octies y 128, and in which the different forms of confiscation are included (direct or ordinary, by substitution or equivalent value, extended, without conviction or without main process and seizure of third party assets). It was in 2015 when the confiscation underwent the largest of its reforms, along with the rest of the accessory consequences, due to international law requirements, due to the transposition of the Directive 2014/42/UE, for this reason, it will be of vital importance throughout the entire work.
In this work the study of Title VI of our Penal Code is carried out, called "accessory consequences", but focusing especially on the analysis of the figure of seizure. The confiscation of the objects of crime is one of the main objectives of judicial intervention, especially in drug trafficking crimes and those committed through the formation of organized gangs. Named prior to the reform 1/2015 as “comiso”, it is currently regulated through nine articles included in the title, which are the 127, 127 bis, 127 ter, 127 quáter, 127quinquies, 127 sexies, 127 septies, 127 octies y 128, and in which the different forms of confiscation are included (direct or ordinary, by substitution or equivalent value, extended, without conviction or without main process and seizure of third party assets). It was in 2015 when the confiscation underwent the largest of its reforms, along with the rest of the accessory consequences, due to international law requirements, due to the transposition of the Directive 2014/42/UE, for this reason, it will be of vital importance throughout the entire work.