DISMINUCIÓN DEL DOLOR PERCIBIDO EN PERSONAS MAYORES CON DOLOR CRÓNICO: EFECTO DIFERENCIAL DE LA INCLUSIÓN DE UN PERRO EN LA EFICACIA DE LA INTERVENCIÓN
Archivos
NO SE HA AUTORIZADO la consulta de los documentos asociados
Fecha
2017-06-20
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
[ES] Este estudio es una investigación piloto tuvo como objetivo principal reducir el dolor percibido por los pacientes afectados de dolor crónico como síntoma o como patología, mediante una adaptación del Programa de intervención cognitivo-conductual del tratamiento del dolor crónico creado por J. Moix y F.M. Kovacs (2009). Se establecieron dos grupos, en uno de ellos se complementaron estas técnicas cognitivo-conductuales con la intervención asistida con animales, a través de la colaboración de un perro, mientras que en el otro no existía este elemento diferencial. Los grupos estaban formados por cinco participantes cada uno con una media de edad de 71,40 años. Para evaluar estos resultados se utilizaron la escala visual analógica (EVA), un cuestionario de motivación, la escala de calidad de vida WHOQOL-BREF, la adaptación española del inventario de afrontamiento CSI y un cuestionario de satisfacción. Tras el análisis de los datos obtenidos, se valoraron las diferencias existentes entre ambos grupos al principio y al final del tratamiento y una valoración global de ambos grupos juntos en todos los campos estudiados al final del tratamiento. Se demostró diferencias significativas a nivel de la percepción del dolor y en la motivación de los participantes por el tratamiento, entre el grupo con perro y el grupo sin perro. En ambos grupos se encontraron diferencias significativas a nivel del dolor percibido desde la valoración inicial a la final del tratamiento.
[EN] This study is a pilot research which has as mean aim decreasing the pain which patients with chronic pain as symptom or pathology fell, by means of an adaptation of cognitivebehavioral intervention program for the treatment of chronic pain, created by J. Moix and F.M. Kovacs (2009). It settled two groups, one of them complemented these cognitive-behavioral therapies with animal-assisted intervention, through the collaboration of a dog, whereas in the other group it was not a differential element. The groups were composed by five participants in each of them with an average age of 71.4 years old. To evaluate those results, these elements were used: Visual analog scale (VAS), a motivation test, quality of life scale WHOQOL-BREF, the Spanish adaptation of the CSI coping inventory and a satisfaction test. After analyzing the data, we assessed the differences between the two groups at the beginning and at the end of treatment and an overall assessment of both groups together in all the fields studied at the end of treatment. Significant differences were found in the perception of pain and in the motivation of the participants for the treatment, comparing the group with the dog and the group without the dog. In both groups, significant differences were found in the level of pain perceived from initial assessment to final treatment.
[EN] This study is a pilot research which has as mean aim decreasing the pain which patients with chronic pain as symptom or pathology fell, by means of an adaptation of cognitivebehavioral intervention program for the treatment of chronic pain, created by J. Moix and F.M. Kovacs (2009). It settled two groups, one of them complemented these cognitive-behavioral therapies with animal-assisted intervention, through the collaboration of a dog, whereas in the other group it was not a differential element. The groups were composed by five participants in each of them with an average age of 71.4 years old. To evaluate those results, these elements were used: Visual analog scale (VAS), a motivation test, quality of life scale WHOQOL-BREF, the Spanish adaptation of the CSI coping inventory and a satisfaction test. After analyzing the data, we assessed the differences between the two groups at the beginning and at the end of treatment and an overall assessment of both groups together in all the fields studied at the end of treatment. Significant differences were found in the perception of pain and in the motivation of the participants for the treatment, comparing the group with the dog and the group without the dog. In both groups, significant differences were found in the level of pain perceived from initial assessment to final treatment.