CONTROVERSIA ENTRE MELANIE KLEIN Y ANNA FREUD
Fecha
2017-05-16
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
EL OBJETIVO DE ESTE TRABAJO ES PROFUNDIZAR EN LOS ORÍGENES DEL PSICOANÁLISIS CON NIÑOS COMO DOS
VERSIONES ANTAGÓNICAS, PARA LO QUE SE HACE UNA REVISIÓN DE LAS PRINCIPALES OBRAS DE MELANIE KLEIN
Y ANNA FREUD. EN PRIMER LUGAR, SE HACE UNA REVISIÓN DE LOS CONCEPTOS TEÓRICOS FUNDAMENTALES DE
CADA AUTORA EN LO QUE RESPECTA AL TRABAJO ANALÍTICO CON NIÑOS. EN SEGUNDO LUGAR, SE TOMAN LOS
PRINCIPALES EJES DE CONFRONTACIÓN DE AMBAS AUTORAS Y SE HACE UNA REVISIÓN SOBRE ELLOS.
FINALMENTE, SE ANALIZA UN CASO CLÍNICO PARA PODER APRECIAR SUS DIFERENCIAS EN LA PRÁCTICA CLÍNICA.
EN EL TRABAJO SE CONCLUYE COMO LA PRINCIPAL DIFERENCIA QUE ENCONTRAMOS ENTRE LAS AUTORAS ES
QUE MELANIE KLEIN DEFIENDE UN PROCESO ANALÍTICO CON NIÑOS MUY SIMILAR AL DE LOS ADULTOS,
MIENTRAS QUE ANNA FREUD DEFIENDE QUE ESTE DEBE SER DIFERENTE; A RAÍZ DE ESTA DIFERENCIA SE
PLANTEAN EL RESTO QUE SE ENCUENTRAN DESARROLLADAS EN ESTE TRABAJO.
THE AIM OF THIS WORK IS TO DELVE INTO THE ORIGINS OF PSYCHOANALYSIS WITH CHILDREN AS TWO ANTAGONISTIC VERSIONS. FOR THIS PURPOSE, THE PAPER DISCUSSES A REVISION OF THE MAIN WORKS OF MELANIE KLEIN AND ANNA FREUD. FIRSTLY, A REVISION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL THEORETICAL CONCEPTS OF EACH AUTOR IN RESPECT TO ANALYTICAL WORK WITH CHILDREN. SECONDLY, THE TWO MAIN AXES OF CONFRONTATION OF BOTH AUTHORS ARE TAKEN AND A REVISION OF THEM IS MADE. FINALLY, A CLINICAL CASE IS ANALYZED IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO APPRECIATE THEIR DIFFERENCES IN REGARD TO CLINICAL PRACTICE. IN THIS PAPER, IT IS CONCLUDED THAT THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE AUTHORS IS THAT MLEANIE KLEIN DENFENDS AN ANALYTIC PROCESS WITH CHILDREN VERY SIMILAR TO THAT OF ADULTS, WHILE ANNA FREUD ARGUES THAT THIS SHOULD BE DIFFERENT; AS A RESULT OF THIS CONTRASTING IDEA, THE REST OF THE DIFFERENCES ARE PRESENTED IN THIS WORK.
THE AIM OF THIS WORK IS TO DELVE INTO THE ORIGINS OF PSYCHOANALYSIS WITH CHILDREN AS TWO ANTAGONISTIC VERSIONS. FOR THIS PURPOSE, THE PAPER DISCUSSES A REVISION OF THE MAIN WORKS OF MELANIE KLEIN AND ANNA FREUD. FIRSTLY, A REVISION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL THEORETICAL CONCEPTS OF EACH AUTOR IN RESPECT TO ANALYTICAL WORK WITH CHILDREN. SECONDLY, THE TWO MAIN AXES OF CONFRONTATION OF BOTH AUTHORS ARE TAKEN AND A REVISION OF THEM IS MADE. FINALLY, A CLINICAL CASE IS ANALYZED IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO APPRECIATE THEIR DIFFERENCES IN REGARD TO CLINICAL PRACTICE. IN THIS PAPER, IT IS CONCLUDED THAT THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE AUTHORS IS THAT MLEANIE KLEIN DENFENDS AN ANALYTIC PROCESS WITH CHILDREN VERY SIMILAR TO THAT OF ADULTS, WHILE ANNA FREUD ARGUES THAT THIS SHOULD BE DIFFERENT; AS A RESULT OF THIS CONTRASTING IDEA, THE REST OF THE DIFFERENCES ARE PRESENTED IN THIS WORK.